This Under-$50 Dress By Lisa Rinna's Daughter Is On Sale At Boohoo - Radar Online |
- This Under-$50 Dress By Lisa Rinna's Daughter Is On Sale At Boohoo - Radar Online
- Wedding guest’s $300 blue dress slammed on forum for looking ‘cheap’ - NEWS.com.au
- Holly Willoughby told to ‘dress sexier’ by mean This Morning viewers after wearing floral midi dress - The Sun
- Some clothes on Gilt appear to be sold for marked-up prices - Business Insider
| This Under-$50 Dress By Lisa Rinna's Daughter Is On Sale At Boohoo - Radar Online Posted: 07 Jun 2019 09:11 AM PDT The Rinna/Hamlin household has never been more fashion-forward! Delilah Belle Hamlin, the supermodel daughter of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star Lisa Rinna, is following in her mom's fashionable footsteps. The 20-year-old is the new face of the boohoo Premium Collection and her capsule collection is filled with so many perfect pieces that we're loving! So, in the words of her famous mother, what's the one piece that will us "owning it" all summer long? It's this Premium Lace Cupped Flare Sleeve Mini Dress as modeled by Delilah Belle! Since boohoo is having a 50% off everything sale right now, it's the perfect time to add to our carts!
See it: Grab the Premium Lace Cupped Flare Sleeve Mini Dress (originally $90) now only $45 for a limited time at boohoo! Little black dresses might rank supreme in each and every closet. From work events to date night, an LBD is an error-proof piece that is always appropriate. But with the warmer weather here, it's only natural to want to lighten things up a bit and lighten the color up. This lacey little number in the dreamiest of dresses to do just that. The structured dress features a lace overlay in a nude tone. It's perfect for those who may be a bit concerned over the lace looking see-through or too sheer. Instead, this lace is the perfect addition to this already dreamy dress. This above-the-knee mini also features a cupped bust section. It's the trendy way to offer up a bit of support and lift! Pair with sandals, heels or mules for an instantly perfect outfit, See it: Grab the Premium Lace Cupped Flare Sleeve Mini Dress (originally $90) now only $45 for a limited time at boohoo! Not your style? Check out even more dresses and everything on sale at boohoo! RadarOnline has affiliate partnerships so we may receive compensation for some links to products and services.  |
| Wedding guest’s $300 blue dress slammed on forum for looking ‘cheap’ - NEWS.com.au Posted: 05 Jun 2019 03:13 PM PDT  A wedding guest's outfit choice has become the subject of online ridicule after internet users branded it "sexy" and "inappropriate". The long, navy blue silk gown was shared to the forum, Wedding Bee, by the concerned sibling of the woman who was planning to wear the dress. Explaining she was "unsure" over her sister's choice of outfit for their brother's upcoming wedding because it had a train, she attached photos of the $299 ensemble. As well as having a "look at me" train, the gown also had ample cleavage, a low-cut back and a silhouette shape. "My sister wants to wear this dress to our brother's wedding," the caption read, explaining the ceremony would be outside in warm temperatures followed by a reception inside a ballroom. "She typically dresses like this, low cut outfits and is thin like the model, not huge boobs where it will be a distraction," she continued. "She asked me if I thought it was okay, I'm not sure …. What do you think? "I personally am not sure about having a train at someone else's wedding?" DRESS BRANDED 'INAPPROPRIATE' While she clearly only took issue with the train — and not the Abyss by Abbey design — pretty much everyone else thought the whole thing was OTT. "It looks like lingerie and I really don't think it's appropriate," one person commented. "That is too much skin. It also looks cheap to me," another brutally remarked. Another said: "The cleavage and back are whatever, but a train? That's barely a half step under wearing a veil. It's pretty much a sign saying 'Look at me, not the bride'. She can be sexy, confident, even risque if that's her style, but a train is none of the above." Others called the outfit "dramatic", "a bit much" and awful, while one even claimed it looked like she was "trying too hard". One person ranted: "Whether she looks like a 'model' or not, this is a WEDDING, not the freaking red carpet. It's not the time to look "sexy" or "fire". If she usually dresses like that, it's clear she enjoys the attention, and that's fine. But this is not her day. She's a guest, not the star of the show." Another agreed, saying: "I might be old fashioned, but I don't think it's respectful to wear something overtly sexy to a WEDDING. Your sister can have the attention every other day of her life — now is not the time for everyone to be looking at her." NOT EVERYONE HATED IT There were a few who defended the choice, calling out those who slammed it. "I actually really like it.. the colour, the design, everything" one said. "I love a deep V, open back, fitted, all that. I would be PISSED if someone told me that the style I dress in is not what they deem 'appropriate'," another wrote. "It's gorgeous," someone else declared. WEDDING SHAMING IS A THING It's not the first time a wedding outfit has been branded inappropriate by angry internet users. In April one bride copped major flak online after her "bum cleavage" gown was shared. Users likened the woman's sleeveless dress to that of a "strip show", with some people branding it as too risque for the special occasion. However it's not just outfits that get called out online as part of the growing wedding shaming trend, with food often coming under fire too. A couple's wedding day spread was branded "pathetic" after a photo of the food was leaked online recently. Included in the catering were slices of unwrapped "plastic cheese", cut up oranges and squares of a chocolate cake adorned with a lemon lolly that were savagely mocked. Continue the conversation @RebekahScanlan | rebekah.scanlan@news.com.au  |
| Posted: 06 Jun 2019 08:15 AM PDT HOLLY Willoughby's style is one that is envied by women nation wide, with the stunning presenter rarely putting a foot wrong when it comes to her fashion choices. However, the mum-of-three has been subjected to a trolling by This Morning viewers who told her she should be dressing "sexier" and dubbed her outfits "frumpy."  9 Holly, 38, shared a snap of her 1940s inspired look on her Instagram account on Tuesday. The presenter, who shares a photo of her outfit with her followers every day, wore a printed puffed-sleeve gown by British designer Anna Mason, costing an eye-watering £725. But while her fans were quick to gush over the ensemble, several cruel commenters dubbed the dress "childish" and called for her to dress "sexier."  9
One wrote: "Mumsy mumsy mumsy! Get a sexier dress, Holly!" "Holly you look amazing in everything but personally think you should wear something more your age more sexy. Those dresses are more for ladies after 50" commented another. A third chided: "Sorry this really doesn't suit you. It looks really frumpy." However, others were quick to jump to Holly's defense arguing that they loved the look.  9  9  9 One wrote: "How about in 2019 we just let women wear what they want and not shame them for it, is that too wild a notion cause you all need something to cry about?" Agreeing a second added: "I'm sure you're thick skinned enough from the critics. You look lovely, nice dresses and people need to remember it's a daytime show."  9  9  9  9 Holly is known for her glamorous and feminine dress sense. Her signature hairstyle is perfectly polished waves worn loosely around her shoulders and she favours a natural but glam beauty look, with defined eyes and rosy lips. The mum-of-three announced in July 2018 that she is launching her own lifestyle brand, Truly. But in September 2018, she revealed she had to step down from the brand due to work and family commitments.
THE FABULOUS BEAUTY AWARDS 2019 Win a dream holiday to Jamaica worth over £4,000 by voting in our Fabulous Beauty Awards All you have to do to be in with a chance of winning this trip, worth over £4,000, is to vote for your fave products. Whether you're a sucker for skincare, a lover of lippy or a hair product hoarder, having your say will mean you can enter our prize draw to not only win this incredible holiday, but to also get your mitts on a host of other incredible prizes – worth a total of more than £13,500!
MYSTIC MEGJune 8: You're ready to tackle a money task instead of just thinking about it
MEG-A-STARMeghan Markle will feature in British Vogue as part of the September edition
LET'S GLOW CRAZYBrighten up your lingerie with sheer neon bras and undies like Rihanna
'WEIGHT LIFTED'Woman has £5k boob job removed after implants reduced her sex drive
GHOSTING BUSTERSHow to cope with being ghosted by dates — from missed calls to invitations
OH BABY!I'm lesbian but I longed for a baby so I conceived with a gay man I met online
MONARCH'S MONIKERDoes the Queen have a surname and what's her official title?
SQUAD GOALSThe HAPs (husbands and partners) cheering on England's Lionesses in World Cup
WEIGHT OF OPINIONTV doc shares 7 tips for weight loss - from curries to snacking on eggs
SPF ALERTWoman left 'looking like Quasimodo' from sunburn after using CARROT tanning oilIn September 2018, fashion fans were delighted by the news that Holly has paired up with M&S on a selection of autumn fashion "Must Haves". This Morning fans often go crazy for copycat styles of what Holly has worn – and snap up her high street staples. Elsewhere in celebrity fashion news, stars love these very revealing loincloth bikinis - but are you brave enough to try one? And we reveal how Melania Trump channelled Meghan Markle's style during her UK tour. Holly Willoughby wears cream knit and checked midi skirt on This Morning  |
| Some clothes on Gilt appear to be sold for marked-up prices - Business Insider Posted: 07 Jun 2019 01:01 PM PDT  Fashion retailer Gilt describes itself as having "insider-level access to coveted designer names at an amazing value" on its website. But the site is being criticized for seemingly selling certain clothes for more than the prices listed by the brands that originally made them. On Thursday, The New Yorker writer Helen Rosner pointed out that Gilt appears to be charging elevated prices for clothing from a brand called 2KOLYORY, which sells its products for much cheaper on its website. Rosner shared screenshots of two pieces on Gilt next to the same items on the original designer's website to show the difference in price"Don't you just hate it when you Google for more info about a dress you found on Gilt, and it turns out that not only is the original price not remotely $429, but Gilt's 'sale' price is actually a 40% markup on retail?" Rosner wrote. The photos Rosner included in a second tweet show a different 2KOLYORY dress being sold for $269 on GILT, and for $248 on the designer's website. INSIDER researched the prices of both items on the two websites and found significant differencesThe first dress that Rosner screenshot, a 2KOLYORY Midi Dress, costs $91 on the designer's website at the time of writing. On Gilt, however, the same garment is currently being sold for $129 — a $38 price increase from the actual designer. Gilt's original retail price also appears to be higher than that from 2KOLYORY. While the designer appears to sell the dress for $91, Gilt's website says the dress originally costs $429 at the time of writing. The same goes for the second dress Rosner mentioned in her tweets. On 2KOLYORY's website, the 2KOLYORY Linen Midi Dress currently retails for $248. But on Gilt, the same dress costs $269.99 at the time of writing. The retailer also says the dress retails for $1,009, which is $761 more than it currently costs on 2KOLYORY's website. INSIDER also checked the prices of other 2KOLYORY products being sold on GiltThe 2KOLYORY Linen Blouse, for example, costs $99.99 on Gilt at the time of writing. The website currently lists the retail value of the blouse at $354. On the 2KOLYORY website, however, the shirt is currently sold for $83, which is $16 less than at the other store. Some Twitter users say they've also seen Gilt list beauty products and cookware for higher pricesIn response to Rosner's tweets, some people shared stories of their own experiences shopping on Gilt. While some said they found overpriced cookware on the site, others said they noticed the same problem with beauty products. Read more: People are mocking a fashion brand for selling a $76 bikini you can't swim in INSIDER checked the prices of a number of beauty products on Gilt's website, and couldn't find any elevated numbersA 1-ounce bottle of Guerlain's Météorites Primer Perfecting Pearls, for example, costs $74 on Sephora's website. On Gilt, the item is listed with the same retail price and is sold for $59.99. Some products were shown with lower retail prices on Gilt, like the Urban Decay Vice Lipstick in the shade "Naked." On Sephora's website, the product costs $19. On Gilt, however, the item is listed with a retail value of $18, and is sold for $15.99. However, INSIDER did find some price discrepancies between cookware. The KitchenAid Artisan Series 5 Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer originally retailed on KitchenAid's website for $379.99, but is now on sale for $299.99. Gilt, however, has the original price of the item listed at $429.99, and is now selling the mixer for $299.99. Those who are unaware of the item's actual price might think they're saving $130 by purchasing the item on Gilt, but they're really saving $80. This isn't the first time Gilt has been accused of creating fake pricesIn 2015, Vice reported that Gilt sells products from a number of in-house brands that it says are disguised as indie designers. The practice allows the website to create fake retail values for items, which can encourage people to shop in the hopes of getting a good deal. "These are brands that are actually made by Gilt, but are made to look like they are discounted merchandise from other labels, both explicitly, via a slash-through price label, and through context, since most merchandise on Gilt is not made through Gilt," Vice reported in 2015. "But Alex + Alex, Zoe + Sam: they're essentially all created by the same people." According to Vice, Gilt began doing so in 2011 when it created its first exclusive label, and the New York Post became one of the first news outlets to report on the practice in 2012. Today, it's unclear how many in-house companies the retailer currently has. Vice reported that Gilt had at least 32 exclusive brands in 2015. Representatives for Gilt and Helen Rosner did not immediately reply to INSIDER's request for comment. Representatives for 2KOLYORY declined to comment.  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from "dresses online" - Google News. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
.jpg)
0 Yorumlar